The reader is referred to section 3.8 in ”Arctic Research Trends - Bibliometrics 2016-2022” for further information.

Toggle full-screen mode by clicking on the square in the upper right corner.

Access the control panel by clicking on the right arrow on the map's right border. Here you can change many parameters pertaining to the layout. For example, you can choose to color institutions based on the level of citation impact rather than collaborative cluster assignments (standard).

Top 140 institutions (based on size) and their groupings based on collaborative patterns.

The size of the nodes is proportional to publication output, colours indicate cluster, and the 300 strongest links are shown. The distance between nodes indicates similarity with respect to the (normalised) number of collaborative papers.

Top 140 institutions (based on Arctic intensity) and their groupings based on collaborative patterns.

The size of the nodes is proportional to publication output, colours indicate cluster, and the 300 strongest links are shown. The distance between nodes indicates similarity with respect to the (normalised) number of collaborative papers.

The tables below provide indicators for the 140 institutions with the largest Arctic publication output and Arctic intensity, respectively,  during the period 2016-2022. Please note that figures can be subjected to biased inherited from the name disambiguation system in Scopus/SciVal and the specific method used for identifying Arctic research (the reader is referred to section 2.5 in the report for more information). The indicators presented are the number of Arctic publications per institution, the number of publication fractions, field-weighted citation impact (FWCI), and Arctic intensity (the share of an institution’s total output in Scopus that is considered Arctic-related). 

Top 140 based on publication output

Top 140 based on Arctic intensity